Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment




Vol 6, Issue 3&4,2008
Online ISSN: 1459-0263
Print ISSN: 1459-0255


A comparison of energy use in organic and conventional tomato production


Author(s):

Sule Turhan *, Basak Canan Ozbag, Erkan Rehber

Recieved Date: 2008-02-22, Accepted Date: 2008-05-25

Abstract:

The organic agriculture began in 1985-1986 production year in Turkey thanks to the fact that the companies in Europe demanded organic products and introduced this production technique to the producers. Organic farming was begun with traditional exportation crops such as raisins, dried fig, dried apricot, hazelnut, chickpea, beans, lentil, olive and olive oil. Tomato production is very important for Turkey in terms of both domestic consumption and exports. The total value of tomato exports of Turkey in 2004 is 109,563,000$ and it constitutes 25% of the total vegetable exports of Turkey in 2004. Organic tomato processed into tomato paste is one of the organic export products of Turkey. Energy auditing is one of the most common approaches of examining energy efficiency and environmental impacts of the production system. The energy consumption patterns in organic and conventional tomato production in Canakkale province of Turkey were investigated in this study. The findings of this study show that energy consumption in organic tomato production per decare is 40.7% and per ton 8% less than in conventional tomato production. The energy output-input efficiency ratio in organic tomato production (0.213) is higher than in conventional tomato production (0.197). While the direct and renewable energy consumption of organic production is higher, the indirect and non-renewable energy consumption is lower than in conventional production. Benefit/cost ratios for organic and conventional tomato production are 2.73 and 2.18. The results also imply that organic tomato production is more profitable for farmers compared to conventional production.

Keywords:

Energy use, organic tomato, conventional tomato, energy efficiency ratio, benefit/cost ratio


Journal: Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment
Year: 2008
Volume: 6
Issue: 3&4
Category: Agriculture
Pages: 318-321


Full text for Subscribers
Information:

Note to users

The requested document is freely available only to subscribers/registered users with an online subscription to the Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password. All abstracts are available for free.

Article purchasing

If you like to purchase this specific document such as article, review or this journal issue, contact us. Specify the title of the article or review, issue, number, volume and date of the publication. Software and compilation, Science & Technology, all rights reserved. Your use of this website details or service is governed by terms of use. Authors are invited to check from time to time news or information.


Purchase this Article:   20 Purchase PDF Order Reprints for 15

Share this article :