Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Water implications of selected energy crops cultivated on a field scale

Author(s):

Robert Borek *, Antoni Faber, Jerzy Kozyra

Recieved Date: 2010-07-18, Accepted Date: 2010-11-03

Abstract:

The predicted rapid increase of agricultural land areas with energy crops in the EU can cause transformation of significant amount of agricultural land, as a result, lead to serious environmental implications. One of the consequences of high biomass production by energy crops is a concomitant usage of large amounts of water. Short rotation crops (SRC) like willow and energy grasses like Miscanthus are especially thought to be deep-rooting and to have high water consumption through transpiration and interception. The aim of the article is to show the results of soil water balance simulation under permanent grass, winter wheat, Miscanthus and willow performed in a one-dimensional Wasim model, moreover to present effective water use by selected crops under studied conditions. The evaluation run in Wasim based on data from experimental stations at Osiny on sandy clay loam and at Grabów on loamy sand in eastern Poland for the period of 2003-2008 revealed, that actual evapotranspiration rates were higher for energy crops than for grass and wheat. Predicted mean annual evapotranspiration ranged from 442 mm in grass to about 500 mm in willow at Osiny and from 530 mm in winter wheat to 623 mm in willow at Grabów. Mean annual interception of energy crops generally amounted to about 16% of gross rainfall. Deficit of hydrologically effective rainfall on loamy sand ranged from 92% in the case of transformation of grass to energy crops to 94% for wheat replacement. For the assessment of crop water use per unit of biomass and per unit of energy, the water footprint concept was assumed. Willow and Miscanthus seems to have the lowest water use per ton of biomass and per potentially available energy unit by comparison with arable crops. Miscanthus has the lowest water footprint per energy unit (7.0-9.4 m³ GJ^-1), willow has somewhat larger footprint (11.5-13.0 m³ GJ^-1). The highest rates of water footprint of wheat (22.0-25.8 m³ GJ^-1) are the result of the lowest yields of this crop. There is a need to conduct additional investigations by other models to verify implications of energy crops on soil water balance and to understand better their impact on water resources on a small scale.

Keywords:

Water balance, biomass, willow, Miscanthus, evapotranspiration, water footprint

---

Journal: Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment
Year: 2010
Volume: 8
Issue: 3&4
Category: Environment
Pages: 1345-1351

---

Full text for Subscribers

---

Information:

Note to users

The requested document is freely available only to subscribers/registered users with an online subscription to the Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password. All abstracts are available for free.

Article purchasing

If you like to purchase this specific document such as article, review or this journal issue, contact us. Specify the title of the article or review, issue, number, volume and date of the publication. Software and compilation, Science & Technology, all rights reserved. Your use of this website details or service is governed by terms of use. Authors are invited to check from time to time news or information.

---

Purchase this Article:   20 Purchase PDF Order Reprints for 15

---

Share this article :