Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Comparison of treatment technologies for pre-treated animal rendering plant wastewater in Scotland

Author(s):

Catherine A. O’Brien, Miklas Scholz ^*, Gordon L. McConnachie

Recieved Date: 2003-02-12, Accepted Date: 2003-04-10

Abstract:

The performance of an industrial membrane bioreactor (MBR) comprising denitrification, nitrification and ultrafiltration for the secondary treatment of primary treated animal rendering wastewater has been compared with an experimental, low-cost and novel vertical-flow constructed treatment wetland. The process wastewater (maximum of 427 m³/d) followed pre-treatment by dissolved air flotation (DAF) and for the pilot plant investigation, five litres were added to a constructed wetland planted with Reedmace (Typha latifolia) approximately twice per week. The highly variable nature of this DAF effluent, gave average mean chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia concentrations of approximately 5200 (± 2050) and 490 (± 270) mg/l, respectively. Scottish Water sets thresholds for discharge into the local sewer of 200 and 500 mg/l for ammonia and suspended solids (SS), respectively. The Mogden equation taking also COD concentrations of the trade effluent into account is used to calculate wastewater charges. Compliance is measured by the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency. The industrial plant effluent for COD and ammonia was 45 and 63 mg/l, respectively. Despite cold climatic conditions (mean of 8°C between October 2002 and May 2003), the mean treatment performance of the constructed wetland for COD, ammonia and SS was 167, 63 and 15 mg/l, respectively. Individual plant sensitivity and effectiveness was also explored. Whilst the MBR treatment performance depends heavily on operation control and maintenance, the passive constructed treatment wetland requires a large footprint but minimal management effort.

Keywords:

Constructed wetland, denitrification, dissolved air flotation, nitrification, rendering plant effluent, ultrafiltration

---

Journal: Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment
Year: 2003
Volume: 1
Issue: 2
Category: Environment
Pages: 314-319

---

Full text for Subscribers

---

Information:

Note to users

The requested document is freely available only to subscribers/registered users with an online subscription to the Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password. All abstracts are available for free.

Article purchasing

If you like to purchase this specific document such as article, review or this journal issue, contact us. Specify the title of the article or review, issue, number, volume and date of the publication. Software and compilation, Science & Technology, all rights reserved. Your use of this website details or service is governed by terms of use. Authors are invited to check from time to time news or information.

---

Purchase this Article:   20 Purchase PDF Order Reprints for 15

---

Share this article :