Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Vol 3, Issue 3&4,2005
Online ISSN: 1459-0263
Print ISSN: 1459-0255

Farmers’ and agricultural advisers’ perceptions on the role of education in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam) production in Teso, Uganda


William Faustine Epeju

Recieved Date: 2005-03-02, Accepted Date: 2005-09-19


Poor husbandry, low use of improved inputs and limited access to technical advice are akin to farmers’ education. Forty-six percent of Teso farmers are literate, but the literacy rate of men (66%) is higher than of women (34%). The study investigated the role of education in sweet potato production. Using an ex post facto research design, 24 out of 51 sub-counties were randomly selected based on district-county strata and used to determine the perceptions of sweet potato farmers and their agricultural advisers. Through interviews, observations and questionnaires, the survey covered 288 farmers and 33 agricultural advisers, while 329 community leaders and farmers were engaged in focus group discussions. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analysed qualitatively using open and axial coding and quantitatively using means, frequencies, percentages, t-test, ANOVA and multiple regression at a confidence level of 0.05 (α). Six sweet potato productivity indicators (output per hectare, output per person, output per shilling spent, income per hectare, income per person and income per shilling spent) and their levels were established. Indigenous technical knowledge was the chief source of the farmers’ knowledge and skills used in production and crop use. Farmers with 1-4 years of primary schooling excelled in output per person, output per shilling and income per shilling. Farmers with 13-18 years of formal education and those who had contact with agricultural extension excelled in output per hectare, income per hectare and income per person. Primary schooling, and secondary and college training facilitated in crop production and business management while agricultural extension and university education facilitated better soil management. Farmers without formal education achieved lower productivity. Therefore, stakeholders should invest more in relevant farmers’ education.


Agricultural advisers, agricultural extension, education, critical inputs in production, farm income, farm output, personal characteristics, formal education, farm productivity, indigenous technical knowledge, sweet potato

Journal: Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment
Year: 2005
Volume: 3
Issue: 3&4
Category: Agriculture
Pages: 95-101

Full text for Subscribers

Note to users

The requested document is freely available only to subscribers/registered users with an online subscription to the Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password. All abstracts are available for free.

Article purchasing

If you like to purchase this specific document such as article, review or this journal issue, contact us. Specify the title of the article or review, issue, number, volume and date of the publication. Software and compilation, Science & Technology, all rights reserved. Your use of this website details or service is governed by terms of use. Authors are invited to check from time to time news or information.

Purchase this Article:   20 Purchase PDF Order Reprints for 15

Share this article :